Know your funder: court decisions and public records
These profiles identify specific court decisions, historical regulatory records, and company statements. Each explains what the source establishes, its limits, and which documents to review in your own matter. They do not establish typical discounts or collection timelines. Sources reviewed September 18, 2026.
We are not affiliated with any funder listed. Profiles summarize public records and attributed reporting; they are information, not legal advice.
Everest Business Funding
The reviewed record for EBF Holdings, doing business as Everest Business Funding, includes a dispute over an allegedly breached settlement. Read the actual procedural result before drawing conclusions about collection practices.
Read the file →Forward Financing
Forward Financing publishes its own explanation of revenue-based financing and contract requirements. Those company materials can help identify questions to ask, but they do not establish independent litigation or settlement outcomes.
Read the file →Fora Financial
Fora’s published 4 Pillar decision concerns an independent sales organization agreement. It is useful context about that dispute, but it is not a merchant default judgment or a measure of merchant settlement outcomes.
Read the file →CFG Merchant Solutions
A published CFG case illustrates why a business’s obligations and a guarantor’s obligations must be assessed separately. It concerns particular settlement documents, not every CFG account.
Read the file →Reliant Funding
The verified regulatory source below concerns a 2021 California annual-report filing matter involving Reliant Services Group. Its scope is narrower than a general finding about every Reliant financing agreement.
Read the file →Expansion Capital Group
California’s April 2022 enforcement summary lists a consent order for Expansion Capital Group. That historical entry is context; it does not establish a current restriction or a result for a merchant’s own dispute.
Read the file →Kalamata Capital Group
A 2026 Erie County decision discusses two revenue-purchase agreements involving Kalamata and Aaction Power Equipment. The opinion supplies a specific record to read rather than an assumed industry collection pattern.
Read the file →Pearl Capital
The reviewed Champion Auto Sales decision concerns Pearl Beta Funding and a challenge to a confession-of-judgment entry. Do not assume a decision involving one Pearl entity establishes the rights of every similarly named company.
Read the file →